Archos 101b Platinum
Specifications
![Archos 101b Platinum Archos 101b Platinum](https://i0.wp.com/www.notebookcheck.net/typo3temp/_processed_/5/8/csm_Archos101bPlatium__1__3ff37a45ab.jpg?resize=150%2C113&ssl=1)
Archos 101b Platinum (Platinum Series)
Processor
unknown
Graphics adapter
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
565 g ( = 19.93 oz / 1.25 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
200 Euro
Links
Average Score: 73% – average
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Reviews for the Archos 101b Platinum
73%Archos 101b Platinum
Source: Stiftung Warentest – Heft 7/2015![German]()
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Stiftung Warentest – Heft 7/2015
![German](https://i0.wp.com/www.notebookcheck.net/typo3conf/ext/nbc2div/images/lang_s_1.gif?w=810&ssl=1)
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 73%
Comment
PowerVR SGX544MP2: OpenGL ES 2.0 compatible with 8 pixel and 4 vertex shaders
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
10.10″:
This is a typical display size for tablets and small convertibles.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
0.565 kg:
This weight is typical for small tablets.
Archos: The French manufacturer Archos S.A. was founded in 1988. While they initially produced products such as MP3 players, they have started producing laptops, smartphones, and tablets in 2009.
The world market shares are small, but there are many reviews on Archos smartphones and tablets. While the ratings were below average in the early years, they have become better by 2016.
73%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.